Deck i took to 3-1 at the Worcester OP event. General idea was to mark someone then pin down someone else forcing multiple losses from the same job
2 comments |
---|
Feb 28, 2016 Doowa |
Feb 29, 2016
jhandy
Yeah, thats exactly what it is. I decided against starting the jail as i felt it just wasnt necessary. I could normally win with 2 deeds anyway and leaving myself with potentially 2 money if I lose lowball could mean i choke myself out. Its more common you'll win by them having no influence than you having lots of CP. The 2 of deeds are for a similar reason. I dont think i ever played a 3rd deed meaning I wanted deeds that were either economically efficient or theire effects were more useful than the other options available. I was rushing the job as much as possible assuming I was holding a cheating res or a pinned down. Without them I was reluctant to kick off but would in exceptional circumstances. |
Excellent take on the first-turn judge (which isn't that here). Any reason you're not starting the jail? And are the 2x deeds cause you only play with 1 base set or? How often did you rush the job as soon as you could?