Hagerty & Halbrook Lawbominations
Polarbeast 32
We'll do it our own way. Preserve the Law, no matter the ethical considerations. Use those willing to help, even if they have to make sacrifices.
Hagerty makes the Dudes, Halbrook arms them, supported by whatever Deputies are hanging about.
We don't have much Influence. We're the ones doing all the work in the lab. So, get rid of those who obstruct our research.
2xA - 2x2 - 4x3 - 1x4 - 0x5 - 14x6 - 3x7 - 9x8 - 9x9 - 1x10 - 2xJ - 3xQ - 2xK
| 7 comments |
|---|
| Mar 08, 2016 tbowers13 |
|
Mar 08, 2016
Polarbeast
If I only had 5-6 cards to draw, it would likely hurt. I win Lowball often enough. So far I tend to pull a lot of full houses... if only because I have enough stud bonuses to better my chances (Wretched with a Holy Wheel Gun, etc.). If someone hit me with a Kidnappin' early on, I wouldn't fare so well. A lot of my decks aren't as terribly tight as they could be for shootout draws... I'm just too attracted to cards that fit a theme, and I build based on cards I have available (all my Flame-throwers and Force Fields are in another deck etc.). Come to think of it, why the heck do I have an Auto-Revolver in a deck that hopes to use studs... |
|
Mar 08, 2016
TybarSunsong
With 7 cards that fail The Wretched (not looking at some of the other gadgets, which will fail with even more frequency), have you had issues with pulls? |
|
Mar 08, 2016
Polarbeast
Ah, yes. Now I remember why I have Asyncoils rather than Flame-throwers: the difficulty. With Hagerty as the intended Wretched wrangler, the 7 cards haven't yet emerged. I might remove Andrew Burton and start Janosz to improve those odds. The original intent was cheap Dudes to sacrifice (Lucy, Luke), but I might replace them as well. The Vitality Tonic is worse (20 fail opportunities (!) unless the Research Institute is in play), so that's got to go. Many thanks for the good points! |
|
Mar 08, 2016
TybarSunsong
Better option for Q Value would be Marty. I'm also not sure if Luke buys you enough here to justify the pull failure. Also, why not use A Slight Modification? |
|
Mar 08, 2016
Polarbeast
A Slight Modification is indeed perfect... it's just in other decks. It's justified to bring it in here since it's the right value and will help shootouts. (I imagine I should publish decks that are ideal versions rather than what I'm playing with) Also good idea to use Marty, especially instead of Luke. |
|
Mar 09, 2016
TybarSunsong
Yeah, I use this to help keep track of decks if I need to tear them apart, though I also split my card pool with someone. :) |
Do you have trouble pulling a full house or better with such an unconcentrated and loose draw structure?