108 Stone Slide

published Jun 24, 2018 | | |
Card draw simulator
Odds: 0% – 0% – 0% – 0% more
Derived from
None. Self-made deck here.
Inspiration for
None yet

jaythejester 380

The fools at jesters industries are at it again, this time with what they believe may be the silliest slide deck yet. (That just might work)

A slide deck with Jasper Stone!?! That’s right. You see, Jasper has a penalty of no draw hand bonuses except from your shooter, but that doesn’t apply at your home. We are trying to make a real nightmare for whosoever comes to try and take out your dudes with influence.

After you get your opponent nice and spread out, and you draw up a decent cheap stud dude, you can try fight your opponents dudes. If you use Stone and ace a dude, either with enough casualties, or Point Blank, you’ll gain more control points and a better shooter.

The draw structure is obviously based on getting a Straight Flush. While doing that out of diamond ♦️ value can present issues, it’s at least a draw structure, more than most Landslide decks boasts.

5 comments
Jun 24, 2018 RNash

Cool list! Why no High Stakes Haven?

For a slightly different take, I think you could probably get away with playing less deeds on the lower values and putting in some more board interaction. This could also let you shift the structure to allow for the occasional full house/4 OAK if you wanted to.

I could see a package on 10, some combination of Moving Forward/Too Much Attention/Unprepared, The Gambler's Gun/Scoop Hound/Jael's Guile, Lucretia Fanzini/Henry Moran/He Fang/Doris Powell/Max Baine (Exp.1).

Or on 7 - Comin' Up Roses/Pinned Down, Monte Bank/LeMat Revolver/Rancher's Lariat, Yunxu Jiang/Carlton "Min" Rutherford/Shizeng Lu/The Grey Man (Androcles Brocklehurst was already on the list, he should stay).

Jun 25, 2018 jaythejester

@RNash Thanks for the reply! There are absolutely some other takes this deck could go, and go a little lighter on deeds while pushing a a back up 4oak structure, similar to Carter’s shooty slide deck.

I opted not for High Stakes Haven because it has a higher cost and possible two fold potential drawback, either costing me economy or a card in hand, or letting my opponent discard a card allowing them to cycle more.

I do like the idea of possibly expanding kung value for more hats, maybe some Winning Agendas, and Old Man McDroste.

The idea of a Stone Gambling Gun build is growing on me also.

Jun 25, 2018 jaythejester

@RNash Thanks for the reply! There are absolutely some other takes this deck could go, and go a little lighter on deeds while pushing a a back up 4oak structure, similar to Carter’s shooty slide deck.

I opted not for High Stakes Haven because it has a higher cost and possible two fold potential drawback, either costing me economy or a card in hand, or letting my opponent discard a card allowing them to cycle more.

I do like the idea of possibly expanding kung value for more hats, maybe some Winning Agendas, and Old Man McDroste.

The idea of a Stone Gambling Gun build is growing on me also.

Jun 26, 2018 jordan caldwell

Love the idea here.

Have you been able to get a straight-flush with a single shooter?

Also can recommend Denise Brancini as she is a great late-game sniper.

Jun 27, 2018 Prodigy

Fun idea :)

Biggest issue I can see for this deck is economy. You are probably going to lose lowball a majority of the time with constant rank 6's.

Maybe change out Agent for Companhursts to help with that? Your total starting influence essentially remains the same since you have Clementine.